/2008/07/10/tdd-vs-bdd-really?format=rss en-us 40 Thoughts around my marriage to technology Good point. Remind me to show you what I am doing at work for generating executable documentation, it's in .NET though. ;-) Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:44:28 -0700 urn:uuid:4d77a9be-5e55-46f3-9344-98ccbce7af3e http://blog.bcarlso.net/2008/07/10/tdd-vs-bdd-really#comment-15 Nick, Is it called FitNesse? :) Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:56:56 -0700 urn:uuid:8af11392-6a4a-4dba-9783-6f8dd114348f http://blog.bcarlso.net/2008/07/10/tdd-vs-bdd-really#comment-16 Nope, it's something a little different. Sat, 12 Jul 2008 06:19:22 -0700 urn:uuid:8411adab-233f-4b22-a91e-81872db77b11 http://blog.bcarlso.net/2008/07/10/tdd-vs-bdd-really#comment-17 Brandon, I am starting to use FitSharp for BDD. The main benefit I get is that analysts can set up edge case data and functions in the Fitnesse Wiki to extend my test platforms. This is pretty significant. TDD is developer driven - BDD is Business Analyst driven. Dennis Stevens Sat, 01 May 2010 11:01:17 -0700 urn:uuid:6cdd9e45-a317-4e17-b942-ee963d6986be http://blog.bcarlso.net/2008/07/10/tdd-vs-bdd-really#comment-36 Dennis, We use Cucumber and FitNesse as part of our acceptance test toolboxes. I totally agree with your use case. I just don't really like the division of the two. To me it's kind of like the debate around whether or not Kanban is an Agile method or not. I'm not sure it is a productive conversation. Thanks! Brandon Tue, 04 May 2010 19:42:15 -0700 urn:uuid:9e94a3a7-4c69-4210-ae80-83bcc82acacf http://blog.bcarlso.net/2008/07/10/tdd-vs-bdd-really#comment-37